Elsevier

Cities

Volume 66, June 2017, Pages 53-62
Cities

Green space benefits for health and well-being: A life-course approach for urban planning, design and management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Urban policy has failed to provide specific design guidance for health & wellbeing

  • Life-course review of evidence linking health, wellbeing & green space undertaken

  • Cohort-specific and cross-cutting design interventions identified

  • A general integrated green space framework for health and wellbeing proposed

  • Specific design guidance for the provision of more inclusive green spaces enabled

Abstract

In recognition that the coming century will see a substantial majority of the world's population living in urban areas, the World Health Organisation and the United Nations have developed policy frameworks and guidance which promote the increased provision of urban green space for population health. However, these undertakings do not provide specific guidance for urban policy in terms of the particular design attributes required to tackle lifestyle illnesses and to promote well-being in urban populations. Furthermore, green spaces have generally been treated as a homogenous environment type. In order to address these weaknesses, this paper collates and reviews the evidence linking health, well-being and green space using a life-course approach. The literature generally endorses the view that urban green spaces, as part of the wider environmental context, promote health and well-being across the life course. Based on the evidence, cohort-specific and cross-cutting design interventions are identified and a general integrated green space framework for health and well-being is proposed. This analytical lens facilitates distillation of a vast quantum of research and the formulation of specific planning and design guidance for the provision of more inclusive green spaces that respond to the varying needs of people across all life-course stages.

Introduction

Across the globe, urban policy-makers are increasingly exploring the links between urban planning and public health as concerns rise on the impacts of urban environments on health outcomes and healthy lifestyles. For example, the recent Habitat III Agenda (United Nations General Assembly, 2016) places promoting human health and well-being as a key urban goal for the 21st Century, while the European Union has been linking health and the urban environment for more than a decade, illustrated by its Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment with a primary aim to ‘improve the environmental performance and quality of urban areas to secure a healthy living environment for Europe's urban citizens’ (CEC, 2006; 4). In part, these initiatives echo the early roots of modern urban planning which emerged in the late 19th and early 20th Century to tackle slum conditions in Europe's industrial cities (Barton, 2010). However, the renewed interest in health and urban planning inter-relationships today reflects the growing evidence that the environment is one of the key determinants of health and well-being alongside inherited characteristics and socio-economic variables (Barton, 2009). Despite this interest, Crawford (2010) notes that close working relationships between urban planners and public health practitioners are remarkably scarce. Moreover, while studies of the environmental and place-based determinants of health and studies of subjective measures of well-being have increased significantly over the last decade, from a planning and design perspective this evidence-base is often piecemeal (e.g. focused on a specific cohort), and translating public health knowledge into urban planning and design interventions and actual proposals remains problematic. In this paper, we address this disconnect by exploring the role of urban green spaces in providing benefits for health and well-being.

Within the academic literature, over the past 10–15 years, there has been a re-emergence of interest examining the impact of the environment on health in advanced economies, with a considerable expansion of theoretical and empirical studies investigating the role of contextual factors in the production and maintenance of health variations (Cummins, Curtis, Diez-Roux, & Macintyre, 2007).1 While there is a longstanding recognition of the negative impacts on health of environmental ‘bads’ such as poor air quality and the distribution of various forms of pollution, more recently increasing attention has focused on the potential positive influence on health of environmental ‘goods’, such as well-designed and walkable cities, access to ‘nature’/biodiversity and the distribution of urban green space (Lake & Townshend, 2006). ‘Lifestyle illnesses’ such as heart disease, obesity, diabetes, osteoporosis, mental illness and some cancers are increasingly attributed to the poor quality of the environment in our cities (Corkery, 2015, Barton, 2010, Berke et al., 2007, Gast et al., 2007, Lake and Townshend, 2006, Frank et al., 2004, Latkin and Aaron, 2003, Gregg et al., 2000, Coutts, 2016). The literature generally endorses the view that urban green spaces, as part of the wider environmental context, promote health and well-being in cities (Gascon et al., 2016, Sugiyama et al., 2010, Kaczynski and Henderson, 2007, Tzoulas et al., 2007, Giles-Corti et al., 2005, Ellaway et al., 2005, Giles-Corti and Donovan, 2003, Maas et al., 2006, WHO, 2016) and provide health services as part of a wider array of ecosystems services (Pretty et al., 2011, Jackson et al., 2013, Lennon and Scott, 2014). These health services are understood to range from direct positive effects on mental and physical health from increased biodiversity, to improved well-being resulting from increased exposure to nature, physical activity and social engagement in green spaces (Sandifer, Sutton-Grier, & Ward, 2015).

In response to the identified health benefits, high-level policy frameworks and guidance documents have increasingly promoted the creation of health supporting urban environments through the increased provision of urban green space (see for e.g., WHO, 2012, WHO, 2013, WHO, 2010, Un General Assembly, 2015). More recently, Habitat III, the United Nations' New Urban Agenda adopted in October 2016, identifies the improvement of human health and well-being as a key priority urban goal. Signatories to the agenda committed to the promotion of a safe, healthy, inclusive, and secure environment in cities and human settlements, specifically highlighting the importance of the creation and maintenance of well-connected and well-distributed networks of green spaces to improve physical and mental health, urban liveability and to enhance resilience to environmental risks. While such policy guidance clearly supports an emphasis on green space provision for population health and well-being, it does not provide detailed guidance for urban policy in terms of the specific attributes required to tackle lifestyle illnesses in multiple cohorts. This is partly consequent on the aggregation and homogenisation of different spatial typologies in much planning and design policy into a measure of so called “green space”, without further qualification as to type or quality of such spaces. Of particular significance is how this homogenisation fails to account for the health benefits afforded to different users by different types of green space distributions and configurations (Hartig et al., 2014, Bowler et al., 2010, Velarde et al., 2007, Jorgensen and Gobster, 2010, Bedimo-Rung et al., 2005). Furthermore, where locational and demographically specific design guidelines for the planning, design and maintenance of green open space do exist in local contexts, the extent to which they reflect or respond to empirical evidence relating to the green space-health relationship can be disputed. Indeed, the health benefits they assert may instead emerge from designs and practices founded on ecosystems protection, flood mitigation or landscape beautification. Such motivations do not necessarily correspond with improved amenity or health benefits.

This paper addresses these issues by collating and reviewing the large quantity of evidence linking health, well-being and green space, and distilling it in a manner that renders it both accessible and useful for those involved in the planning and design of urban green spaces. This is achieved by adopting a novel life-course approach to examine the evidence for health and well-being benefits accruing from green space from prenatal development through childhood, adolescence, adulthood and old age. A literature search was undertaken using research databases including Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. ‘Green-space’ and ‘health’ search terms and their variants were applied and identified articles were grouped by life-course stage. In order to ensure that all key empirical studies were included, comprehensive review articles were subsequently identified and their references were cross-checked with the initial articles. Finally, the most recent articles in quality peer reviewed journals citing these review articles were identified. Informed by the evidence collated and reviewed hereunder, we propose planning and design interventions for each cohort group. Following this, we synthesise the key findings from the review of cohort-specific studies to formulate a series of cross-cutting interventions for health promoting urban green space. We conclude by suggesting a path for future research and practice. It is intended that this approach can facilitate the formulation of site specific planning guidance for the provision of more inclusive green spaces that respond to the varying needs of people across all life-course stages.

Section snippets

Green space and health across the life-course

Numerous studies have investigated whether there is an association between people's access to green space or nature and personal levels of activity. More specifically, studies have examined how the design of the public realm encourages people to be more physically active, if it contributes to improved health outcomes, or if it attracts people to be more active (Ord et al., 2013, De Vries et al., 2003, Hillsdon et al., 2006, Kessel et al., 2009, Coombes et al., 2010). The majority of such

Developing an integrated green space framework for health and well-being

In adopting a life-course approach, this review has identified key variations within and between population cohorts regarding the green space attributes that promote health and well-being. That is, it is demonstrated how different green space configurations afford different activities and promote different physical and psychological responses for different age groups. As such, this life-course approach facilitates a more nuanced understanding of those green space attributes that promote health

Conclusion

Urbanisation and the associated increasing rise of obesogenic environments are creating health and well-being challenges for the planning and design of urban environments (Davies, 2013). Concomitantly, green spaces in cities are increasingly viewed as providing locations for ‘restorative’ contact with nature, physical activity and social engagement, which evidence suggests positively influences well-being and triggers behavioural change towards healthier lifestyles (Beyer et al., 2014, Van Den

Funding acknowledgement

This work was undertaken as part of the ECO-Health project, funded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Health Service Executive under Grant Award No. 2015-HW-MS-6, and supports the implementation of the EPA Strategic Plan 2016–2020 – ‘Our Environment, Our Wellbeing’ and Healthy Ireland, the national framework for action to improve the health and wellbeing of the people of Ireland.

References (122)

  • S. De Vries et al.

    Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2013)
  • Y. Fan et al.

    Neighborhood green, social support, physical activity, and stress: Assessing the cumulative impact

    Health & Place

    (2011)
  • L.D. Frank et al.

    Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars

    American Journal of Preventive Medicine

    (2004)
  • M. Gascon et al.

    Residential green spaces and mortality: A systematic review

    Environment International

    (2016)
  • B. Giles-Corti et al.

    Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?

    American Journal of Preventive Medicine

    (2005)
  • P. Grahn et al.

    Landscape planning and stress

    Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

    (2003)
  • P. Grahn et al.

    The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration

    Landscape and Urban Planning

    (2010)
  • M. Hillsdon et al.

    The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity

    Public Health

    (2006)
  • A. Kessel et al.

    Multidisciplinary research in public health: A case study of research on access to green space

    Public Health

    (2009)
  • K. Lachowycz et al.

    What can global positioning systems tell us about the contribution of different types of urban greenspace to children's physical activity?

    Health & Place

    (2012)
  • G.S. Lovasi et al.

    Neighborhood safety and green space as predictors of obesity among preschool children from low-income families in New York City

    Preventive Medicine

    (2013)
  • J. Maas et al.

    Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health

    Health & Place

    (2009)
  • I. Markevych et al.

    Surrounding greenness and birth weight: Results from the GINIplus and LISAplus birth cohorts in Munich

    Health & Place

    (2014)
  • I. Markevych et al.

    Access to urban green spaces and behavioural problems in children: Results from the GINIplus and LISAplus studies

    Environment International

    (2014)
  • R. Mitchell et al.

    Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study

    The Lancet

    (2008)
  • N.D. Mustapa et al.

    Repositioning children's developmental needs in space planning: A review of connection to nature

    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

    (2015)
  • D. Nutsford et al.

    An ecological study investigating the association between access to urban green space and mental health

    Public Health

    (2013)
  • E.A. Richardson et al.

    Gender differences in relationships between urban green space and health in the United Kingdom

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2010)
  • P.A. Sandifer et al.

    Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation

    Ecosystem Services

    (2015)
  • S.A. Schule et al.

    Built and socioeconomic neighbourhood environments and overweight in preschool aged children. A multilevel study to disentangle individual and contextual relationships

    Environmental Research

    (2016)
  • T. Sugiyama et al.

    Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: Do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships?

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (2008)
  • T. Sugiyama et al.

    Initiating and maintaining recreational walking: A longitudinal study on the influence of neighborhood green space

    Preventive Medicine

    (2013)
  • K. Agay-shay et al.

    Green spaces and adverse pregnancy outcomes

    Occupational and Environmental Medicine

    (2014)
  • C. Albus

    Psychological and social factors in coronary heart disease

    Annals of Medicine

    (2010)
  • S.A. Anderssen et al.

    Fysisk aktivitetsnivå i Norge

    (2004)
  • M. Annerstedt et al.

    Green qualities in the neighbourhood and mental health–Results from a longitudinal cohort study in Southern Sweden

    BMC Public Health

    (2012)
  • T. Astell-burt et al.

    Is neighborhood green space associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes? Evidence from 267,072 Australians

    Diabetes Care

    (2014)
  • T. Astell-burt et al.

    The association between green space and mental health varies across the lifecourse. A longitudinal study

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (2014)
  • P.B. Baltes et al.

    New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age

    Gerontology

    (2003)
  • H. Barton

    Strengthening the roots of planning

    Planning Theory & Practice

    (2010)
  • E.M. Berke et al.

    Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2007)
  • K.M. Beyer et al.

    Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: Evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

    (2014)
  • R.D. Bixler et al.

    Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable

    Environment and Behavior

    (1997)
  • D.E. Bowler et al.

    A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments

    BMC Public Health

    (2010)
  • CEC

    Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament on thematic strategy on the urban environment

    (2006)
  • L. Chawla

    Growing up in an urbanizing world

    (2002)
  • L. Chawla

    Benefits of nature contact for children

    Journal of Planning Literature

    (2015)
  • D.A. Cohen et al.

    Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • L. Corkery

    BEYOND THE PARK: Linking urban greenspaces, human well-being and environmental health

  • C. Coutts

    Green infrastructure and public health

    (2016)
  • Cited by (232)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text